by Fr Ian
In Parts 1 and 2 I tried to give a basic definition of Christian prayer and I claimed that prayer is a necessary activity, and the primary activity, for Christian believers. In the next two posts I'll say more about these two aspects of prayer.
As human beings we need prayer because we need God.
We don’t have to be religious-minded to conclude that human beings are driven by a kind of ‘hunger of the heart’, made up of various needs or longings that overlap and connect with each other. We have a longing for happiness and fulfilment in our lives. We seek purpose and meaning in our activities and our relationships, and we have a need for love - a need to give love to others and to receive love from them.
These different facets of our inner hunger often make themselves known to us by their absence: we experience feelings of dissatisfaction, incompleteness, emptiness and pointlessness when our existence lacks meaning and purpose, when we fail to attain a certain minimal level of contentment, and when our relationships feel somehow superficial and lacking in love and commitment.
This is true even when, as often happens, individuals can’t put their finger on the precise causes of their unhappiness, when they don’t know exactly why they feel dissatisfied or empty.
It’s worth mentioning also that the prospect of ageing and eventual death, if reflected on seriously, and not simply avoided or endlessly pushed out of conscious awareness, focuses our attention on our human hunger for meaning and happiness.
The depressing sense of the shortness and transience of earthly life, the conclusion many people reach that all purely human achievements, and even our most cherished relationships, end in the sadness and futility of extinction, actually express in a negative way the intuition that we yearn for immortality, for permanence, for the continuation of life beyond death, and, maybe most important of all, for some kind of assurance that love doesn’t die.
Our vocation to transcendence and its denial
Of course in the Christian perspective this quest for happiness, for meaning and for eternity is really a manifestation of our search for God. The psychological, emotional and spiritual hunger that we experience, and its negative expression in feelings of incompleteness and futility, point us towards God and can only be fulfilled in relationship with God. Earthly life alone, finite objects, human relationships, mundane purposes and goals can’t and won’t satisfy our longing.
Ultimate happiness, and the ultimate purpose of human life and love, all lie beyond the realm of the finite. To fulfil our true vocation as human beings we need to rise above the realm of present experience and open ourselves to the infinite, the transcendent, the uncreated - the realm of God.
Contemporary Western culture - liberal, democratic, capitalist culture - denies this Christian conviction and in fact is founded on its denial. Its architects reject all notions of a transcendent end of human life.
The dominant assumption now is that if human beings need meaning, happiness and love in their lives then they must find them solely on the horizontal level and within the realm of the natural, mundane, the transient. There is no vertical, super-natural end-point for any of our inner longings: that idea is the product of wishful thinking.
Western culture has therefore become a kind of walled city. God has been cast out and its citizens are self-enclosed within a sphere that is purely secular, human and one-dimensional.
Conformism vs conversion
Different individuals negotiate this reality in different ways.
First there are the contended conformists as we might call them - men and women who ask for no more than a certain level of security and success in their lives, materially and emotionally. They concentrate on their immediate relationships and everyday activities; they accept the majority values of society and rarely question them.
Their attitude, more or less, is: ‘we’re born, we work and play and love, we get older and die, and maybe we leave behind some happy memories in the minds of those who knew us’. They never seriously consider the possibility that there may be another, higher reality beyond the horizon of this world, and that our lives might have another, higher purpose.
So contented conformists are those who live their whole lives without ever embarking on the search for God. And we can ask the question: how many church members and professed Christians today are really no more than contended conformists, behind the veneer of a shallow and merely social ‘faith’?
Second there are what we might call the discontented conformists. These individuals are emotionally restless and unhappy, but they attempt to rid themselves of their discomfort by changing their personal life circumstances (work, home, relationships), by therapy or medication, even by adopting the odd ‘spiritual’ practice like meditation or some other technique of self-improvement. The consumer capitalist economy offers many such ‘solutions’ .
At the present time especially, in my view, many discontented conformists, particularly the young, seek resolution of their inner restlessness by involving themselves in social and political causes. Reforming the conventions and structures of society, they believe, will remove the causes of unhappiness.
But in this response again there’s a failure to progress beyond a one-dimensional mentality that denies the transcendent aspect of human existence and of the world we live in. In fact there are many men and women who, in spite of considerable introspection, never move beyond the confines of the self, who stubbornly and even angrily refuse to open the question of God, despite persistent feelings of alienation and anxiety.
Finally there’s a third group of people, the individuals we can accurately label the converts. These are the spiritual non-conformists, the men and women who have come to reject, in a kind of positive disillusion, today’s horizontal and self-enclosed concept of human life.
By a process of reflection, intuition and gradual awakening to truth the converts have come to recognise the diminished view of persons and relationships prevalent in modern society.
They’ve seen through the bogus gratifications of consumerism and the inane distractions of commercial entertainment. They’ve observed and experienced the atomisation of a culture dedicated to sovereign individualism. They’ve identified the fraudulent assumptions embedded in mainstream political commentary and the will to power lurking within today’s grand projects of technological betterment.
But their disillusion, as suggested a moment ago, is a positive thing. In keeping with the Gospel summons to metanoia the converts are those who have taken the first steps in turning their backs on today’s false values and attitudes, and the lifestyles based on them, and have begun moving towards the true, transcendent end of life - towards God.
Of course the Gospel affords no glib optimism that the majority will take this path. Jesus himself encountered many contented and discontented conformists, in whom, for various reasons, the seed of his word failed to take root (Mk 4:1-20). These individuals far outnumbered those who received the seed, tended it in good soil and produced a rich harvest.
Towards the true and living God
What this means for us, as Christians, is that our current task is to lead the converts forward from their initial disenchantment, which is only a kind of preamble to faith, to the discovery of the true and living God.
Vague religiosity, arising from personal whims and preferences, isn’t enough; worse than that, it leads people astray. We have to undermine confidence in the rulers of this present age and their bogus wisdom (1 Cor 2:6), and bring people face to face with the God who has made his plan of love known to us, beginning in Old Testament times, culminating in the mission of his Son and available now to ‘all who have ears to hear’ through the community of the Church.
And this is where prayer becomes necessary. To come face to face with the God who has created us and redeemed us, who sanctifies us and makes us holy, who guides us towards the fulfilment of our own God-given vocation in this life, and who finally draws us into everlasting life with him, each of us needs to open a line of personal and individual communication with him.
It’s only by developing a habit of prayer that we can experience God and communicate with him person-to-person, rather than simply amassing information about him. It’s only through prayer that we can create a fertile environment in which all the other elements of Christian spiritual life can bear fruit.
So to be Christian today means to be men and women who pray, who direct the inner longing of our souls to God, asking him on his part to come to us, transform us by his grace, and lead us into his divine life:
‘Hear, O LORD, when I cry aloud,
3 comments:
Ian, I've just read the 3rd part of your thoughts on prayer, - a lot to take on board and think about, and I won't read the next instalment until I've digested number 3.
Yes I can follow and relate to your line of reasoning very clearly. For want of a better word I struggle with the "elitist" nature of the analysis given. Please don't take this as a criticism, its more for me a struggle with how we, how God, can cope, relate to a world in
which the vast majority of the population are relatively immune to feelings of the divine. Yes, there is an "elite" (sorry that horrible word again!) of people who, are for whatever reason, in tune with spirituality, and even seek to be great athletes in the realm of spirituality. But nevertheless we look back in human history, and billions of people have simply not registered on the scale of spirituality, or have simply bumped along on the bottom base line.
If we are conscious beings "created in the image of God", how do we square that with the reality of human spiritual ineptness? Did God make a mistake when designing us, or was the "workmanship" shoddy? I can't help thinking, feeling that the "elitist" analysis you give in article 3 is somewhere missing something. If I'm going to have an outlook on life that is truly spiritual, then somehow I need to find a place for the missing billions.
Perhaps to try an illustrate what I mean, the ultimate in "elitist" theology, is exemplified in the mindset of Jehovah's witnesses. Just ask them, when they come knocking on our doors, "What is God going to do with all the "failed spiritual athletes" who don't come up to JH's ideal of spiritual perfection." If you push them, the JW's will come up with a vision of a genocidal hell, instigated by God!!! Help, spare me from that kind of God! Now I know that this example is an extreme illustration, but as "religious" don't we need to accommodate the billions? I can't accept that simply being the "elite spirituals" is the complete answer to being one with God. If we are serious about the relationship between humans and God, surely we need a more nuanced explanation. Simply dividing us up into the 3 categories you suggest is just not acceptable, and only goes to perpetuate the divisive side of Christianity, which has plagued the church ever since Paul and Peter had their tiff 2000 years ago. THERE IS SO MUCH TO THINK ABOUT.
As you say, Roland, "THERE IS SO MUCH TO THINK ABOUT".
Meditation is indeed a deeply spiritual practice. Likewise, many people's spiritual understanding has been deepened by books from the Spiritual and Self- help shelves of bookshops. It seems that people get more from them than from church going....we should be looking at why church teaching is failing everybody.
Post a Comment